Tag:Cryptocurrency

1
Federal Banking Regulators Adopt a Permissive Stance on Cryptocurrency
2
Crypto.com’s Mission to Seek Regulatory Clarity for Digital Assets
3
Banking Regulators’ Growing Concerns over Bank-Fintech Partnerships
4
Vermont Enters a New Age of Virtual Currency Money Transmission
5
The Long and Winding Road: Navigating Fintech and Crypto App Approvals by the Apple Store
6
Australia: Crypto in the Courts
7
EU/Luxembourg Update on the Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets and the Digital Operational Resilience Act
8
AML Reforms Part 2: Digital Currency Service Providers
9
The Aloha State Finally Welcomes Crypto
10
California is Seeking Industry Input on New Crypto Rules

Federal Banking Regulators Adopt a Permissive Stance on Cryptocurrency

By: Grant Bulter, Richard Kerr, and Win Gustin

The federal banking regulators have each recently adopted a more permissive approach to the regulation of cryptocurrency activities within the banking sector. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) have issued new guidance that relaxes previous restrictions and requirements for banks engaging in crypto-related activities. The three agencies have also withdrawn two interagency statements, the Joint Statement on Crypto-Asset Risks to Banking Organizations (3 January 2023) and the Joint Statement on Liquidity Risks to Banking Organizations Resulting from Crypto-Asset Market Vulnerabilities (23 February 2023).

Read More

Crypto.com’s Mission to Seek Regulatory Clarity for Digital Assets

By: Cheryl L. Isaac, Judith Rinearson, Eden L. Rohrer, and Joshua L. Durham

On 8 October, Crypto.com made two novel, strategic moves to seek regulatory clarity regarding the classification of digital assets. First, the digital asset exchange sued the SEC, claiming that the SEC exceeded its statutory authority with respect to its classification of digital assets as securities without any notice-and-comment rulemaking as required under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Second, Crypto.com’s affiliate that is a CFTC-registered derivatives exchange petitioned the SEC and CFTC to provide a joint interpretation on how its swap products should be governed by the agencies.

Read More

Banking Regulators’ Growing Concerns over Bank-Fintech Partnerships

By: Jeremy M. McLaughlin, Grant F. Butler, Andrew C. Glass, Gregory N. Blase, and Joshua L. Durham

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have jointly issued a request for information (RFI) seeking input on the nature, risks, and implications of bank-fintech partnerships. Accompanying the RFI, the agencies issued a joint statement on banks’ arrangements with third parties to deliver bank deposit products and services (Joint Statement). We will be hosting a webinar on this topic on 10 September (register here), and comments to the RFI are due 30 September.

Read More

Vermont Enters a New Age of Virtual Currency Money Transmission

By: Jeremy McLaughlin and Joshua Durham

Effective July 2024, Vermont rehauled its money transmission law, joining the other states (approximately half) that have enacted some or all of the Money Transmission Modernization Act (MTMA). In doing so, Vermont furthers a trend of states expanding their regulators’ purview over the virtual currency industry.

Read More

The Long and Winding Road: Navigating Fintech and Crypto App Approvals by the Apple Store

By: Andrew Hinkes and Judie Rinearson

Much has been written about the effort it takes to have a new app approved by the Apple App Store. With good reason, Apple’s strict approval process ensures quality and maintains the standards of its ecosystem. As Apple itself reports, in 2023 it “rejected more than 1.7 million app submissions for failing to meet the App Store’s stringent standards for privacy, security, and content.”1 An article from Decode about the top reasons for an Apple rejection2 included the usual tech-related problems: The app is low quality; there are broken links; lots of bugs and crashes; etc.

Read More

Australia: Crypto in the Courts

By: Daniel Knight and Ben Kneebush

On 4 June 2024, the latest chapter in ASIC’s crypto-asset enforcement efforts unfolded with the Federal Court relieving Block Earner from liability to pay penalties in connection with providing unlicensed financial services (ASIC’s media release can be found here).

Read More

EU/Luxembourg Update on the Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets and the Digital Operational Resilience Act

By: Dr. Jan Boeing and Tanner Wonnacott

MiCA Update

The Regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCA)1 is part of the European Commission’s Digital Finance Package of September 2020, which includes other regulatory initiatives, such as the Pilot Regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology2 and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).3

Read More

AML Reforms Part 2: Digital Currency Service Providers

By: Daniel Knight and Kithmin Ranamukhaarachchi

The Australian Attorney-General’s Department (Department) has released five consultation papers outlining proposals for extensive reforms to Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regime.

Read More

The Aloha State Finally Welcomes Crypto

By: Jeremy McLaughlin and Joshua Durham

Hawaii has long been a thorn in the side of crypto companies. That thorn has finally been removed: on 25 January 2024, the Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs issued a press release summarizing its findings on the proper regulatory framework for cryptocurrency—its conclusion is that it will not apply the state’s money transmitter law to cryptocurrency activities. Hawaii initially worked with cryptocurrency companies to create an alternative licensing framework, but was ultimately unable to conceive of an adequate digital asset license.

Read More

California is Seeking Industry Input on New Crypto Rules

By: Jeremy McLaughlin and Josh Durham

The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) is requesting comments on potential rules it will promulgate to implement the state’s recently-enacted Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL), which establishes a formal licensing regime for digital asset service providers. Please review our client alert for a detailed analysis of the new law, which takes effect 1 July 2025.

Read More

Copyright © 2025, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.