Tag:ASIC

1
Regulators in Australia and Ontario sign co-operation agreement
2
More regulatory sandboxes
3
Roboadvisers are Go: ASIC guidance for digital advice
4
Strong response to ASIC sandbox proposal
5
Regulatory sandbox and innovative regulation
6
ASIC update on fintech regulatory sandbox proposal
7
Providing digital advice to retail clients
8
Marketplace lending how-to from the Australian regulator
9
Blockchain not Bitcoin Becomes Industry Focus
10
Robo Advice Regulation Movement in Three Jurisdictions

Regulators in Australia and Ontario sign co-operation agreement

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) have signed a co-operation agreement to promote FinTech innovation. The agreement will make expansion into the Australian and Ontarian markets easier for growing FinTech businesses.

A referral mechanism has been created under the new agreement which allows ASIC to refer Australian FinTech businesses wanting to enter the Ontarian market to OSC and vice versa. Referred businesses will receive support to understand the market’s regulatory framework and how it applies to them from dedicated staff at the relevant regulator. To qualify for support FinTech businesses will need to meet the eligibility criteria of their home regulator including being a new or early stage FinTech business which has an innovation or product which will likely provide benefits to investors and consumers.

Both ASIC and OSC have established internal teams to assist FinTech businesses with their regulatory obligations and encourage development of the FinTech industry. ASIC’s Innovation Hub was established in April 2015 and OSC recently established LaunchPad in October 2016.

ASIC and OCS have also committed to share information about emerging market trends and potential impacts on regulation.

ASIC has entered into similar co-operation agreements with the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the Monetary Authority of Singapore amongst others this year.

More regulatory sandboxes

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) has released details of the framework for Malaysia’s regulatory sandbox. The finalisation of the framework follows a consultation which began in July.

Under the sandbox framework BNM may consider granting regulatory exemptions to applicants for the purpose of testing an innovative product, service or solution for a period of up to 12 months.

Applicants wishing to apply for the sandbox should have innovations which are ready for testing and have the potential to:

  • improve the accessibility, efficiency, security and quality of financial services;
  • enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of Malaysian financial institutions’ management of risks; or
  • address gaps in or open up new opportunities for financing or investments in the Malaysian economy.

Read More

Roboadvisers are Go: ASIC guidance for digital advice

By Daniel Knight and Claire De Koeyer

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) this week released Regulatory Guide 255: Providing digital financial product advice to retail clients (RG). The RG clarifies how financial product advice obligations apply to providers of digital advice.

ASIC supports the development of a healthy and robust ‘digital advice’ or ‘robo-advice’ market in Australia, while recognising the need to protect consumers.

As with other advice providers, robo-advisers will need to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) or be authorised by an AFSL holder and will be subject to a range of duties, including the duty to act in the best interests of their clients.

Read More

Strong response to ASIC sandbox proposal

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

ASIC’s regulatory sandbox consultation has drawn a mixed response from around 30 businesses, industry and consumer groups which have made submissions.  To refresh your memory about ASIC’s proposals check out our previous blog.

Tyro Payments was very supportive of the concept of a sandbox but had a few concerns about the proposed structure. Tyro’s main concern was the role of sponsors controlling start-ups’ access to the sandbox. It noted that Australia’s associations, hubs and accelerators were dependent on funding from industry incumbents and that exposing the sandbox to their influence is like “putting the fox in charge of the hen house”. Tyro was in favour of a UK style sandbox where applicants’ transitions into licensing are considered on a case by case basis by the regulator.

Read More

Regulatory sandbox and innovative regulation

By Daniel Knight

Australian FinTechs are closer to getting a regulatory “sandbox” after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released its detailed consultation paper this week.  The paper details proposals for a testing ground for innovative robo-advice providers and other similar services.  It also highlights ASIC’s views about some regulatory options already open to FinTechs under the current law, as we discussed in a previous post.

In a sign of ASIC’s engagement with this nascent sector, ASIC launched its proposals at a fintech startup founders event in Melbourne.  ASIC emphasised it is seeking industry feedback and is open to making changes.

Read More

ASIC update on fintech regulatory sandbox proposal

By Jim Bulling and Jack Fraser

ASIC has put out a media release on the proposed regulatory sandbox licensing exemption and will release a public consultation paper on the proposal in June of this year. The purpose of the sandbox is to foster innovation in the FinTech industry by allowing eligible businesses to test their products in the market without initially being subject to the usual regulatory mechanisms and requirements.

ASIC Commissioner John Price said that this “consultation paper will seek feedback on additional steps that ASIC may take to facilitate fintech innovation while maintaining protections to ensure investor and consumer trust and confidence”.

Read More

Providing digital advice to retail clients

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released a draft guide on digital financial product advice for consultation. The draft guide does not introduce new regulatory concepts but clarifies some of the uncertainties that have arisen about how existing obligations will apply to robo-advisers.

Generally, robo-advice is provided using algorithms and without the involvement of a natural person. To ensure that consumers are provided with competent advice ASIC is proposing that at least one manager who is used to demonstrate the organisational competence of the licensee (Responsible Manager) must meet the training and competence standards applicable to natural persons who provide advice to retail clients.

Read More

Marketplace lending how-to from the Australian regulator

By Daniel Knight

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released guidance for marketplace lenders navigating Australia’s existing dual licensing regimes for credit and financial products.  While the guidance is helpful, it does not overcome the need for marketplace lenders, like other fintech innovators, to contort themselves into existing regulatory boxes.

ASIC’s Information Sheet 213 focuses on establishing a marketplace lending platform using Australia’s managed investment scheme regime, by far the most popular Australian structure where a trust is interposed between borrowers and lenders.  This regime was designed for pooled collective investment vehicles, such as traditional managed funds, and is not well adapted to pure peer-to-peer lending.  Individual regulatory relief is often needed to overcome these challenges – for example, to facilitate investor withdrawals – and the Information Sheet helpfully outlines the relief ASIC has previously given to industry players.

Read More

Blockchain not Bitcoin Becomes Industry Focus

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

Blockchain, the public decentralised ledger technology behind Bitcoin, is gaining attention from a much wider audience within the financial services industry in terms of the potential application to securities clearing and settlements, payment processing and loan transactions.

Read More

Robo Advice Regulation Movement in Three Jurisdictions

by Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

After increasing concerns that robo-advisers may not fit neatly into existing regulations, Australian, United States and United Kingdom regulators have all indicated in the last few months that they will be looking at the appropriateness of current regulations for the increasingly fast growing industry of automated financial advice.

Read More

Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.