Tag:Australia

1
RegTech Association launches in Australia
2
Part 1: What is the new Australian crowd sourced funding regime?
3
Part 2: Looking to raise capital under the new Australian crowd sourced funding regime?
4
Part 3: Looking to become a CSF intermediary under the new Australian crowd sourced funding regime?
5
Adapt or die, the reality for retail banks during a digital revolution
6
Found out that you can’t play in the sandbox?
7
ASIC provides update on the Innovation Hub
8
Will there be an Asia Pacific ‘FinTech Passport’ in the future?
9
Regulating digital advice in Australia
10
UK Department for International Trade announces FinTech mission to Australia

RegTech Association launches in Australia

By Claire de Koeyer and Jim Bulling

Launching in March 2017 the RegTech Association is focused on “promoting the achievements, partnerships, collaborations, incubations and seeding of RegTech in Australia” through advocating, educating and supporting businesses in the sector. This is likely to involve facilitating engagement with industry stakeholders, advancing the use of technology and improving regulatory compliance outcomes.

Read More

Part 1: What is the new Australian crowd sourced funding regime?

By Rania Seoud, Claire de Koeyer and Daniel Knight

Crowd-sourced funding (CSF) is a developing alternative to traditional capital funding methods, allowing eligible early stage / start-up companies to raise funds from a larger pool of investors without the need for costly disclosure documents such as a prospectus.

CSF took significant steps forward with  the Corporations Amendment (Crowd Sourced Funding) 2016 (Cth) (Act) that establishes a regulatory framework to facilitate CSF by small, unlisted public companies in Australia receiving assent and coming into operation. The CSF regime takes effect from 28 September 2017.

The Act allows eligible unlisted public companies with an annual turnover or gross assets of up to $25 million to advertise their business plans on a licensed online crowd funding platform to raise up to $5 million in 12 month rolling periods. Investors receive a share of the company in return for their investment.

Read More

Part 2: Looking to raise capital under the new Australian crowd sourced funding regime?

By Rania Seoud, Andrew Gaffney and Daniel Knight

While the CSF regime removes some of the existing regulatory barriers to capital raising, there are a number of other key considerations for eligible companies intending to utilise the CSF regime.  Below are just a few:

  • CSF intermediary platform requirements: Offers for a company’s securities must be made through an authorised CSF intermediary. At this point in time and apart from service fees, it is unclear whether a CSF intermediary will impose any other obligations on the company to be admitted onto their platform (e.g. due diligence, verification and CSF offer document sign off obligations).
  • Disclosure requirements: The CSF offer document must contain certain information required by the regulations which are yet to be released.
  • Liability: The Company and its individual directors and officers may be held liable for loss or damage suffered by a person due to a defective CSF offer document. Accordingly, it is important that you have a reasonable objective basis for the contents of the CSF offer document. In particular, you will need to be careful when providing financial forecasts and statements regarding future events.
  • Restrictions on advertising: There will be restrictions on advertising for the CSF offer.
  • How do you value your business: In practice, you will need to determine a pre-money valuation for your company to set an appropriate offer issue price.
  • Setting a minimum size for investment: While there is a maximum investment cap of $10,000 per investor per offer, to avoid having many shareholders with small parcels and the associated administrative burden, you may want to consider setting a minimum subscription amount.
  • Share buy-back mechanisms: Where certain requirements are met, companies utilising the CSF regime will be exempt from meeting higher corporate governance and reporting requirements applicable to public companies for a period of 5 years (e.g. annual audit and filing of financial statements). At the expiry of the 5 year period, the company may want to ensure that it has in place effective mechanisms to allow it to convert back to a proprietary company should the need arise (e.g. consider including share buy-back, share valuation mechanisms in the company’s constitutional documents).

You may find our article on CSF intermediaries and ASIC’s CSF Guidance of use. 

Part 3: Looking to become a CSF intermediary under the new Australian crowd sourced funding regime?

By Rania Seoud, Claire de Koeyer and Daniel Knight

Central to the new CSF regime is the inclusion of the AFS licence holder who acts as the intermediary (i.e. the gatekeeper). The intermediary must hold an AFSL with the correct authorisations in order to carry out this role. After 28 September 2017, ASIC will be able to accept AFS licence applications from entities wanting to provide CSF services.

Considering acting as a CSF intermediary? There are a number of things you may wish to consider, including:

Read More

Adapt or die, the reality for retail banks during a digital revolution

By Cameron Abbott and Giles Whittaker

Traditional banking is a thing of the past, at least according to 203 senior retail banking executives surveyed by the Economist Intelligence Unit.

According to an Economist Intelligence Unit report for Temenos, the EU’s Second Payment Services Directive (PSD2), which will force banks to provide interfaces, APIs and data to third parties, is set to “tip the scales between banks and FinTechs for customer loyalty.” More than half of financial transactions will be made through FinTech companies rather than traditional retail banks by 2020, as the latest EU payments directive unleashes competition.

Read More

Found out that you can’t play in the sandbox?

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

The Australian Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) regulatory sandbox is up and running exempting qualifying businesses from holding an Australian financial services licence or Australian credit licence. There are a number of reasons why a business may not be eligible including:

  • the business will issue the financial products;
  • it is likely that there will be more than 100 retail clients
  • it is likely that the value of the financial products will be more than $5 million;
  • 12 months testing will not be sufficient; or
  • the financial products the business deals with fall outside the eligible products for the sandbox which are:
    • simple managed investment schemes;
    • non-cash payment systems issued by a bank;
    • listed securities;
    • government bonds; and
    • unsecured loans.

So what are your options if you don’t meet all the eligibility criteria but don’t want to obtain your own licence?

Read More

ASIC provides update on the Innovation Hub

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

In a recent speech, Australian Securities and Investments Commission Chairman Greg Medcraft released information on FinTech businesses which have taken advantage of the Innovation Hub established by ASIC in April earlier this year. Robo-advisers and marketplace lenders were the most prevalent types of businesses to approach the Innovation Hub. The 109 different businesses that the Innovation Hub engaged with this year included:

  • 25 robo-advisers
  • 22 marketplace lenders
  • 17 payments businesses
  • 11 credit providers
  • 9 crowdsourced equity providers

ASIC has also noted that those who received assistance from the Innovation Hub before applying for an Australian financial services licence were approved on average 95 days or 45% faster than those who hadn’t.

Will there be an Asia Pacific ‘FinTech Passport’ in the future?

By Jim Bulling and Michelle Chasser

Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Chairman, Greg Medcraft, has discussed cooperation between FinTech regulators at the recent International Institute of Finance Chief Risk Officer Forum in Singapore.

The Chairman noted “because the internet knows no boundaries” cooperation and collaboration between regulators is critical and developing responses to FinTech should not be done in isolation. The Chairman then highlighted the following steps required for cooperation.

1. Sharing information

Regulators in Australia, UK, Singapore, Canada, Kenya, South Korea, Switzerland and India have entered into various cooperation agreements with other regulators to share information about FinTech developments and emerging trends in their markets. Many of the cooperation agreements also allow FinTech businesses to access Innovation Hubs in other jurisdictions. The Chairman noted that ASIC was also informally in regular contact with regulators in the US and Europe.

2. Harmonisation

While ideally regulators would work towards harmonising their regulatory responses and approaches, it was acknowledged that this will be a challenge due to competition between countries to attract FinTech businesses. The Chairman raised the possibility of introducing a “fintech passport” which could ease entry into other jurisdictions for businesses. Another possible solution raised was to develop “equivalence processes” around regulation.

Read More

Regulating digital advice in Australia

By Jim Bulling and Meera Sivanathan

Recently, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) presented its views on regulating digital advice at a Financial Services Council event. The discussion provided an overview of the regulator’s priorities in this space. Below are a few key takeaways relevant to those currently providing or seeking to provide digital advice:

  1. Clear disclosure: ASIC would like to see clear disclosure in relation to the services and advice a consumer may expect to receive and express statements regarding advice that the consumer will not receive. Consumers need to be able to easily identify what advice will and will not be provided to them.
  2. Testing consumer knowledge: ASIC suggests ‘testing’ potential consumers in the following ways:
  • With respect to consumer protection – implementing methods to test consumer understanding of the scope of advice provided – that is, what advice will and will not be provided. Such protocols may alleviate any risk that a potential consumer is unaware of the scope of advice to be provided.
  • With respect to better understanding your client, implementing ‘quizzes’ to gauge the consumer’s level of knowledge regarding different products, which may be offered. This could give the digital advice provider an idea of the level of knowledge and understanding that the consumer may possess in relation to complex products.
  1. Record keeping: Companies providing digital advice should have appropriate and robust algorithm record keeping systems. Ideally, the systems in place should control, monitor, review and effectively record any changes made to the algorithms. Digital advice providers should be able to substantiate the reasons for updating the algorithm, which underpins the advice given. Some examples of possible record keeping measures relating to algorithms include automated reports which can be downloaded and provided to ASIC if requested or snap shots in time.

UK Department for International Trade announces FinTech mission to Australia

By Jonathan Lawrence

The UK’s Department for International Trade (DIT) has announced its first FinTech mission to Australia taking place in Sydney and Melbourne from 20-23 March 2017.

DIT will select 8-12 UK FinTech companies to participate in the mission to Australia where they will participate in a programme of events and activities. Delegates will spend two days in Sydney, two days in Melbourne and an optional fifth day in Australia or New Zealand. The delegates will meet with and pitch to Australian financial institutions and venture capital firms, visit FinTech hubs, meet the regulator and government ministers, network with the Australian FinTech community, hear from UK FinTech companies that have found success in Australia and schedule meetings with potential customers and partners.

British Consul General in Sydney and Director-General UK Trade & Investment for Australia and New Zealand, Nick McInnes said: “We are very pleased to have the opportunity to bring a group of UK FinTech companies to Australia for the first time and introduce them to the local market. While FinTech in Australia is still in relatively early stages, the industry is growing rapidly and there are many opportunities for UK companies to set up, collaborate and succeed. The FinTech market in Australia is forecast to grow to over AU $4 billion by 2020, of which AU $1 billion will be completely new added value to the Australian economy, so now is an ideal time for UK companies to enter the market”.

For more details, please click here.

Copyright © 2024, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.